goose: be protected in illinois

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents bird
Weight: 0.72
, fowl
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.66
, bald eagle
Weight: 0.59
Siblings snow goose
Weight: 0.67
, coot
Weight: 0.46
, turkey
Weight: 0.38
, pheasant
Weight: 0.38
, peregrine falcon
Weight: 0.38

Related properties

Property Similarity
be protected in illinois 1.00
be protected in indiana 0.89
be protected in ohio 0.88
be protected in canada 0.85
is protected 0.79
be in oregon 0.78
be protected in us 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bald eagle, is protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(goose, be protected in illinois)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(bald eagle, is protected)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(bald eagle, is protected)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(pheasant, is protected)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(bald eagle, is protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(goose, be protected in illinois)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(pheasant, is protected) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(pheasant, is protected)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(goose, be protected in illinois)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(goose, be protected in ohio)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(goose, be protected in ohio)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(goose, be protected in ohio)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(goose, be protected in indiana)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(goose, be protected in indiana)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(goose, be protected in indiana)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(goose, be protected in canada)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(goose, be protected in ohio)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(goose, be protected in canada)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(goose, be protected in canada)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(goose, be protected in indiana)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(goose, be protected in canada)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(goose, be in oregon)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(goose, is protected)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Salient(goose, be in oregon)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Typical(goose, be protected in us)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(goose, be in oregon)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(goose, be in oregon)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(goose, is protected)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Plausible(goose, be protected in us)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(goose, be protected in us)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(goose, is protected)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(goose, be protected in us)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(goose, is protected)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Salient(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(goose, be protected in illinois)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Plausible(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(goose, be protected in illinois)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(bald eagle, is protected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(pheasant, is protected)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(goose, be protected in illinois) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(bald eagle, is protected)