gopher: cover holes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.64
, mammal
Weight: 0.58
, service
Weight: 0.55
, snake
Weight: 0.55
, species
Weight: 0.55
Siblings coyote
Weight: 0.35
, beaver
Weight: 0.35
, cougar
Weight: 0.35
, badger
Weight: 0.35
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
cover holes 1.00
make holes 0.90
dig holes 0.86
dig many holes 0.85
has physical part holes 0.85
plug holes 0.84
has physical part hole 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(coyote, dig holes)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(badger, dig holes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(coyote, dig holes)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(coyote, dig holes)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(badger, dig holes)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(badger, dig holes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(gopher, cover holes)

Similarity expansion

0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(gopher, dig holes)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(gopher, dig holes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(gopher, make holes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(gopher, dig many holes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(gopher, dig holes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(gopher, dig holes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(gopher, dig many holes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(gopher, dig many holes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(gopher, plug holes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(gopher, dig many holes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(gopher, make holes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(gopher, plug holes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(gopher, plug holes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(gopher, has physical part holes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(gopher, make holes)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(gopher, has physical part hole)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(gopher, plug holes)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(gopher, has physical part holes)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(gopher, has physical part hole)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(gopher, has physical part holes)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(gopher, has physical part hole)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(gopher, make holes)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(gopher, has physical part holes)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gopher, has physical part hole)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(gopher, cover holes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(gopher, cover holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(coyote, dig holes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(gopher, cover holes)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(badger, dig holes)