gopher: has physical part holes

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.64
, mammal
Weight: 0.58
, service
Weight: 0.55
, snake
Weight: 0.55
, species
Weight: 0.55
Siblings coyote
Weight: 0.35
, beaver
Weight: 0.35
, cougar
Weight: 0.35
, badger
Weight: 0.35
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part holes 1.00
has physical part hole 0.95
make holes 0.90
cover holes 0.85
plug holes 0.83
dig holes 0.83
dig many holes 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(coyote, dig holes)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(badger, dig holes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(coyote, dig holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(coyote, dig holes)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(badger, dig holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(badger, dig holes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Salient(gopher, has physical part holes)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(gopher, dig holes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(gopher, dig holes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Salient(gopher, dig holes)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(gopher, dig many holes)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(gopher, dig many holes)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(gopher, dig many holes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(gopher, plug holes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(gopher, cover holes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Salient(gopher, make holes)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Salient(gopher, plug holes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(gopher, has physical part hole)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(gopher, make holes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Typical(gopher, dig holes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(gopher, make holes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(gopher, make holes)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(gopher, plug holes)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(gopher, has physical part hole)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(gopher, has physical part hole)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(gopher, has physical part hole)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(gopher, cover holes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(gopher, plug holes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(gopher, dig many holes)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(gopher, cover holes)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.45
Typical(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(gopher, cover holes)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.60
Salient(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(gopher, has physical part holes)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(gopher, has physical part holes)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(coyote, dig holes)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(gopher, has physical part holes) ⋁
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Typical(badger, dig holes)