gopher: has quality resource

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents animal
Weight: 0.64
, mammal
Weight: 0.58
, service
Weight: 0.55
, snake
Weight: 0.55
, species
Weight: 0.55
Siblings coyote
Weight: 0.35
, beaver
Weight: 0.35
, cougar
Weight: 0.35
, badger
Weight: 0.35
, grizzly bear
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality resource 1.00
has quality bad 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(gopher, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(cougar, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(gopher, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(cougar, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(cougar, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(gopher, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(gopher, has quality resource)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(gopher, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Salient(gopher, has quality bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(gopher, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(gopher, has quality bad)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(gopher, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(gopher, has quality bad)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(gopher, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(gopher, has quality bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(gopher, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(gopher, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(gopher, has quality resource)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Plausible(gopher, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(gopher, has quality resource)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(gopher, has quality resource)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(cougar, has quality bad)