gourd: is nutrition

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents fruit
Weight: 0.63
, crop
Weight: 0.60
, material
Weight: 0.50
, vegetable
Weight: 0.50
, decoration
Weight: 0.49
Siblings pear tree
Weight: 0.36
, crab apple
Weight: 0.35
, melon
Weight: 0.35
, watermelon
Weight: 0.35
, almond tree
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
is nutrition 1.00
be good for health 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.50
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fruit, be good for health)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(gourd, is nutrition)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.03
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(gourd, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(fruit, be good for health)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(gourd, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(fruit, be good for health)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(fruit, be good for health)
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(gourd, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Plausible(gourd, is nutrition)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(gourd, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Salient(gourd, is nutrition)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
Remarkable(gourd, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(gourd, be good for health)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(gourd, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(gourd, be good for health)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(gourd, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(gourd, be good for health)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(gourd, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(gourd, be good for health)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.45
Salient(gourd, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(gourd, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(gourd, is nutrition)

Typical implies Plausible

0.48
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.17
Plausible(gourd, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(gourd, is nutrition)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(gourd, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fruit, be good for health)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.01
Typical(gourd, is nutrition)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(fruit, be good for health)