gpl: has quality bad

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents license
Weight: 0.63
, free software
Weight: 0.51
, source code
Weight: 0.50
, project
Weight: 0.49
, contract
Weight: 0.46
Siblings linux
Weight: 0.34
, marriage license
Weight: 0.32
, apache
Weight: 0.32
, perl
Weight: 0.32
, javascript
Weight: 0.31

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality bad 1.00
has quality good 0.96
has quality better 0.90
have bad reputation 0.81
has quality evil 0.80
has quality shit 0.79
has quality price 0.78
be considered bad 0.78
is 3 bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(source code, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gpl, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gpl, has quality bad)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gpl, has quality bad)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(source code, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gpl, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(contract, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gpl, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gpl, has quality bad)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.09
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(project, has quality bad)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(source code, has quality bad)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(project, has quality good)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(contract, has quality price)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(source code, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.55
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality bad)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality bad)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(source code, has quality good)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(project, has quality good)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(contract, has quality price)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(javascript, has quality bad)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(javascript, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(perl, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(perl, have bad reputation)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(javascript, be considered bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Remarkable(linux, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(linux, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.81
Plausible(source code, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(project, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(contract, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(source code, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
Plausible(project, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(contract, has quality price)
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.77
Remarkable(linux, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(linux, has quality good)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(linux, has quality better)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(linux, has quality better)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(perl, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(perl, has quality good)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(javascript, has quality good)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(javascript, has quality good)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(javascript, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Plausible(javascript, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(javascript, be considered bad)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(javascript, be considered bad)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(perl, have bad reputation)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(perl, have bad reputation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(gpl, has quality bad)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Plausible(gpl, is 3 bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(gpl, is 3 bad)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(gpl, is 3 bad)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(gpl, is 3 bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
Salient(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Typical(gpl, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(source code, has quality bad)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(source code, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(contract, has quality price)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(javascript, has quality bad)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Typical(linux, has quality better)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(linux, has quality good)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(perl, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Typical(javascript, has quality good)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(javascript, be considered bad)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(perl, have bad reputation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Typical(project, has quality bad)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(contract, has quality good)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(source code, has quality bad)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(project, has quality good)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Typical(contract, has quality price)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.53
Typical(gpl, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(source code, has quality good)