grand canyon: is interesting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents national park
Weight: 0.74
, monument
Weight: 0.71
, park
Weight: 0.71
, national monument
Weight: 0.69
, adventure
Weight: 0.69
Siblings yellowstone national park
Weight: 0.37
, central park
Weight: 0.36
, death valley
Weight: 0.36
, national forest
Weight: 0.35
, mountain climbing
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
is interesting 1.00
is exciting 0.84
is funny 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.46
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(park, is funny)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(grand canyon, is interesting)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(adventure, is exciting)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(grand canyon, is interesting)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(grand canyon, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(adventure, is exciting)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(grand canyon, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(park, is funny)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grand canyon, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(park, is funny)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grand canyon, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(adventure, is exciting)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.71
Plausible(adventure, is exciting)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(grand canyon, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(grand canyon, is interesting)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.89
Plausible(park, is funny)
Evidence: 0.66
Remarkable(grand canyon, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Plausible(grand canyon, is interesting)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(grand canyon, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(grand canyon, is interesting)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(grand canyon, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(grand canyon, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grand canyon, is interesting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Plausible(grand canyon, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(grand canyon, is interesting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grand canyon, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(adventure, is exciting)
0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(grand canyon, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(park, is funny)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(grand canyon, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(adventure, is exciting)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.95
Typical(grand canyon, is interesting)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(park, is funny)