grandma: be good at cooking

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents woman
Weight: 0.71
, mom
Weight: 0.66
, friend
Weight: 0.64
Siblings nana
Weight: 0.50
, grandmother
Weight: 0.41
, aunt
Weight: 0.39
, dad
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good at cooking 1.00
has cooking 0.94
cook good 0.89
make better food 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(grandma, be good at cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Salient(grandma, be good at cooking)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(grandma, be good at cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(grandma, has cooking)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(grandma, be good at cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(grandma, has cooking)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(grandma, be good at cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Salient(grandma, has cooking)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(grandma, be good at cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(grandma, make better food)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(grandma, be good at cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(grandma, cook good)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(grandma, be good at cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(grandma, make better food)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.74
Typical(grandma, be good at cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(grandma, make better food)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(grandma, be good at cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(grandma, make better food)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(grandma, be good at cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Plausible(grandma, cook good)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(grandma, be good at cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(grandma, cook good)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(grandma, be good at cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Remarkable(grandma, cook good)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(grandma, be good at cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(grandma, has cooking)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.59
Salient(grandma, be good at cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(grandma, be good at cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(grandma, be good at cooking)

Typical implies Plausible

0.34
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(grandma, be good at cooking) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Typical(grandma, be good at cooking)