grant: be useful for students

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents agreement
Weight: 0.66
, benefit
Weight: 0.61
, fee
Weight: 0.61
, tool
Weight: 0.60
, part
Weight: 0.60
Siblings application
Weight: 0.33
, contract
Weight: 0.32
, reimbursement
Weight: 0.32
, stipulation
Weight: 0.32
, first aid kit
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful for students 1.00
were helpful to people 0.83
is useful 0.83
were helpful to early people 0.81
be important to schools 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(grant, be useful for students)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(grant, be useful for students)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(grant, be useful for students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to people)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(grant, be useful for students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(grant, be useful for students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to early people)
0.23
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(grant, be useful for students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(tool, were helpful to people)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(grant, be useful for students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(application, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(tool, were helpful to early people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(grant, be useful for students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(grant, be useful for students)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(tool, were helpful to people) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(grant, be useful for students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(grant, be useful for students)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(grant, be useful for students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(application, is useful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(application, is useful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(grant, be useful for students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(grant, be useful for students)

Similarity expansion

0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(grant, be useful for students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(grant, be important to schools)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(grant, be useful for students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(grant, be important to schools)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(grant, be useful for students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Plausible(grant, be important to schools)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(grant, be useful for students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(grant, be important to schools)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.84
Salient(grant, be useful for students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(grant, be useful for students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(grant, be useful for students)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Plausible(grant, be useful for students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(grant, be useful for students)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.47
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(grant, be useful for students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to people)
0.13
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(grant, be useful for students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(grant, be useful for students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(application, is useful)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(grant, be useful for students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to people)
0.29
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(grant, be useful for students) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(tool, were helpful to early people)