grapefruit: be bad for statins

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents flavor
Weight: 0.71
, fresh fruit
Weight: 0.66
, vegetable
Weight: 0.63
, fruit
Weight: 0.61
, food
Weight: 0.60
Siblings pear
Weight: 0.38
, lemon juice
Weight: 0.38
, orange juice
Weight: 0.37
, fruit salad
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bad for statins 1.00
be bad for diabetics 0.80
be good for diabetics 0.79
be bad for heart patients 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(orange juice, be bad for diabetics)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Remarkable(pear, be good for diabetics)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(orange juice, be good for diabetics)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(orange juice, be bad for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(orange juice, be bad for diabetics)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
Remarkable(orange juice, be good for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(orange juice, be good for diabetics)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.30
Remarkable(pear, be good for diabetics) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Plausible(pear, be good for diabetics)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Salient(grapefruit, be bad for statins)

Similarity expansion

0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(grapefruit, be bad for diabetics)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(grapefruit, be bad for diabetics)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(grapefruit, be bad for diabetics)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(grapefruit, be bad for heart patients)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(grapefruit, be bad for heart patients)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(grapefruit, be bad for heart patients)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Remarkable(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(grapefruit, be good for diabetics)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(grapefruit, be bad for diabetics)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(grapefruit, be bad for heart patients)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(grapefruit, be good for diabetics)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(grapefruit, be good for diabetics)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(grapefruit, be good for diabetics)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Salient(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(grapefruit, be bad for statins)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.03
Plausible(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(grapefruit, be bad for statins)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(orange juice, be bad for diabetics)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Typical(pear, be good for diabetics)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Remarkable(grapefruit, be bad for statins) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(orange juice, be good for diabetics)