graph: be useful presenting

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents tool
Weight: 0.59
, item
Weight: 0.58
, feature
Weight: 0.57
, structure
Weight: 0.56
Siblings chart
Weight: 0.66
, asymptote
Weight: 0.34
, calculator
Weight: 0.33
, spreadsheet
Weight: 0.33
, map
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
be useful presenting 1.00
is useful 0.80
be helpful displaying 0.79
be useful organizing 0.77
be important in visual presentation 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(feature, is useful)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(graph, be useful presenting)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(feature, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.22
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(feature, is useful)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(chart, is useful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(chart, be important in visual presentation)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.34
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(spreadsheet, is useful)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(map, is useful)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(feature, is useful)
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(graph, be useful presenting)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(map, is useful)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(map, is useful)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(spreadsheet, is useful)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(spreadsheet, is useful)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.84
Remarkable(chart, is useful)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Plausible(chart, is useful)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(chart, be important in visual presentation)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(chart, be important in visual presentation)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(graph, be useful presenting)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(graph, is useful)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(graph, be helpful displaying)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(graph, be useful organizing)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Salient(graph, be important in visual presentation)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Typical(graph, is useful)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Plausible(graph, is useful)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Plausible(graph, be helpful displaying)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(graph, be helpful displaying)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(graph, be useful organizing)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(graph, be useful organizing)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Remarkable(graph, be helpful displaying)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Plausible(graph, be important in visual presentation)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(graph, be important in visual presentation)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(graph, is useful)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(graph, be important in visual presentation)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Remarkable(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(graph, be useful organizing)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Salient(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(graph, be useful presenting)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Typical(graph, be useful presenting)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.15
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.36
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(feature, is useful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(spreadsheet, is useful)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(map, is useful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(chart, is useful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Remarkable(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(chart, be important in visual presentation)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.84
Typical(graph, be useful presenting)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(feature, is useful)