graphite: be considered as element

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.65
, substance
Weight: 0.63
, ceramic
Weight: 0.60
, silicon carbide
Weight: 0.56
, tool
Weight: 0.55
Siblings titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.37
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.36
, magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be considered as element 1.00
be considered element 0.99
is element 0.92
be less components identified 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be considered as element)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(aluminum foil, is element)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.55
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(graphite, be considered as element)
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(aluminum foil, is element)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(aluminum foil, is element)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(graphite, be considered as element)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(graphite, be considered as element)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(graphite, be considered as element)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Typical(graphite, be considered element)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(graphite, be considered as element)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be considered element)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
Remarkable(graphite, be considered as element)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(graphite, is element)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.13
Typical(graphite, be considered as element)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(graphite, is element)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(graphite, be considered as element)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Plausible(graphite, be considered element)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(graphite, be considered as element)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(graphite, be considered element)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(graphite, be considered as element)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(graphite, is element)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(graphite, be considered as element)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Salient(graphite, is element)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.58
Salient(graphite, be considered as element)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(graphite, be considered as element)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be considered as element)

Typical implies Plausible

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(graphite, be considered as element)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(graphite, be considered as element)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be considered as element)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(aluminum foil, is element)