graphite: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents material
Weight: 0.65
, substance
Weight: 0.63
, ceramic
Weight: 0.60
, silicon carbide
Weight: 0.56
, tool
Weight: 0.55
Siblings titanium dioxide
Weight: 0.37
, aluminum oxide
Weight: 0.36
, magnesium oxide
Weight: 0.36
, aluminum foil
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
has quality use 0.88
be good making 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.59
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(graphite, has quality good)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ceramic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(graphite, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(ceramic, has quality good)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(ceramic, has quality good)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(tool, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Plausible(tool, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(graphite, has quality good)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(ceramic, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(graphite, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(graphite, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(graphite, has quality use)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(graphite, has quality use)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(graphite, has quality use)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Salient(graphite, be good making)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(graphite, be good making)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(graphite, be good making)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(graphite, has quality use)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Remarkable(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(graphite, be good making)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.87
Salient(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(graphite, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(graphite, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.27
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ceramic, has quality good)
0.26
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Remarkable(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(ceramic, has quality good)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.91
Typical(graphite, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(tool, has quality good)