grasshopper: be back leg alike

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, creature
Weight: 0.57
, bird
Weight: 0.57
, crop
Weight: 0.55
Siblings gypsy moth
Weight: 0.37
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.36
, aphid
Weight: 0.36
, ant
Weight: 0.36
, moth
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be back leg alike 1.00
be alike 0.78
has physical part legs 0.76
lose legs 0.76
rub together legs 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(moth, be alike)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(moth, be alike)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Plausible(moth, be alike)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(grasshopper, be back leg alike)

Similarity expansion

0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(grasshopper, rub together legs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(grasshopper, rub together legs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(grasshopper, rub together legs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(grasshopper, has physical part legs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(grasshopper, lose legs)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(grasshopper, lose legs)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, lose legs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(grasshopper, lose legs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Plausible(grasshopper, has physical part legs)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(grasshopper, be alike)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, rub together legs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Salient(grasshopper, has physical part legs)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(grasshopper, be alike)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(grasshopper, be alike)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, has physical part legs)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
Remarkable(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, be alike)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, be back leg alike)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(grasshopper, be back leg alike)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, be back leg alike)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(moth, be alike)