grasshopper: harm humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents insect
Weight: 0.65
, thing
Weight: 0.59
, creature
Weight: 0.57
, bird
Weight: 0.57
, crop
Weight: 0.55
Siblings gypsy moth
Weight: 0.37
, dung beetle
Weight: 0.36
, aphid
Weight: 0.36
, ant
Weight: 0.36
, moth
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
harm humans 1.00
is harmful 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, harm humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(dung beetle, is harmful)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.37
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, harm humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(aphid, is harmful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(grasshopper, harm humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(aphid, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Plausible(aphid, is harmful)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(grasshopper, harm humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.85
Remarkable(dung beetle, is harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(dung beetle, is harmful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(grasshopper, harm humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Salient(grasshopper, harm humans)

Similarity expansion

0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
Remarkable(grasshopper, harm humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, is harmful)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(grasshopper, harm humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Salient(grasshopper, is harmful)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.49
Typical(grasshopper, harm humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(grasshopper, is harmful)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(grasshopper, harm humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(grasshopper, is harmful)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.61
Salient(grasshopper, harm humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(grasshopper, harm humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, harm humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Plausible(grasshopper, harm humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(grasshopper, harm humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, harm humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(aphid, is harmful)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(grasshopper, harm humans) ⋁
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(dung beetle, is harmful)