grassland: be good for farming

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents habitat
Weight: 0.73
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.57
, area
Weight: 0.52
, land
Weight: 0.50
, altitude
Weight: 0.49
Siblings wetland
Weight: 0.38
, marsh
Weight: 0.36
, grass
Weight: 0.35
, moss
Weight: 0.34
, pond
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be good for farming 1.00
be suitable for farming 0.90
be good for agriculture 0.89
be important for agriculture 0.86
be good for food production 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.62
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(land, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(grassland, be good for farming)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(land, be good for farming)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Remarkable(land, be good for farming)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(land, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(grassland, be good for farming)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(grassland, be good for farming)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(grassland, be suitable for farming)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Salient(grassland, be good for agriculture)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(grassland, be important for agriculture)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(grassland, be good for agriculture)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(grassland, be suitable for farming)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Plausible(grassland, be good for agriculture)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(grassland, be suitable for farming)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(grassland, be important for agriculture)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Salient(grassland, be good for food production)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(grassland, be important for agriculture)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(grassland, be good for food production)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be good for food production)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(grassland, be good for food production)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be good for agriculture)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be suitable for farming)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be important for agriculture)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be good for farming)

Typical implies Plausible

0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.86
Plausible(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(grassland, be good for farming)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.18
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(land, be good for farming)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(grassland, be good for farming)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(land, be good for farming)