grassland: be important to ecosystems

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents habitat
Weight: 0.73
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.57
, area
Weight: 0.52
, land
Weight: 0.50
, altitude
Weight: 0.49
Siblings wetland
Weight: 0.38
, marsh
Weight: 0.36
, grass
Weight: 0.35
, moss
Weight: 0.34
, pond
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to ecosystems 1.00
is ecosystem 0.89
be important biome 0.80
be prevalent natural vegetation of lands 0.78
be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands 0.78
be prevalent natural vegetation of low lands 0.78
be prevalent natural vegetation of central low lands 0.77
be called biomes 0.76
is biome 0.76
be important to humans 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.28
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(grassland, be important to ecosystems)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.11
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.25
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(ecosystem, be important to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.74
¬ Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.22
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(pond, is ecosystem)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.29
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(ecosystem, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(grassland, be important to ecosystems)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(pond, is ecosystem)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Plausible(pond, is ecosystem)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.74
Remarkable(wetland, be important to humans)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(wetland, be important to humans)

Salient implies Plausible

0.24
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Salient(grassland, be important to ecosystems)

Similarity expansion

0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(grassland, is ecosystem)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(grassland, is ecosystem)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(grassland, is ecosystem)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(grassland, be important biome)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Salient(grassland, be called biomes)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central low lands)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of lands)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Salient(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of low lands)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(grassland, is biome)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Salient(grassland, be important to humans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be called biomes)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(grassland, be called biomes)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Plausible(grassland, is biome)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(grassland, is ecosystem)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central low lands)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(grassland, is biome)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be important biome)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central low lands)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of low lands)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of lands)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(grassland, be called biomes)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(grassland, be important biome)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of lands)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of low lands)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of low lands)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of lands)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central low lands)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(grassland, be prevalent natural vegetation of central lands)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be important to humans)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Typical(grassland, be important biome)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(grassland, be important to humans)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
Remarkable(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(grassland, is biome)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(grassland, be important to humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.94
Salient(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be important to ecosystems)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.83
Plausible(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Typical(grassland, be important to ecosystems)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(pond, is ecosystem)
0.03
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.30
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(wetland, be important to humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Typical(grassland, be important to ecosystems)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(ecosystem, be important to humans)