great barrier reef: has quality good

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents coral reef
Weight: 0.83
, reef
Weight: 0.82
, water
Weight: 0.64
, ecosystem
Weight: 0.63
Siblings ocean water
Weight: 0.35
, sea water
Weight: 0.35
, shallow water
Weight: 0.34
, golden gate bridge
Weight: 0.34
, pier
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality good 1.00
is great 0.81

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.65
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(reef, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(great barrier reef, has quality good)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(great barrier reef, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Plausible(reef, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.13
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(great barrier reef, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(reef, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.68
Plausible(reef, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(great barrier reef, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(great barrier reef, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(great barrier reef, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(great barrier reef, has quality good)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(great barrier reef, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.00
¬ Typical(great barrier reef, is great)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.96
Remarkable(great barrier reef, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(great barrier reef, is great)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(great barrier reef, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(great barrier reef, is great)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(great barrier reef, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Salient(great barrier reef, is great)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(great barrier reef, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(great barrier reef, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(great barrier reef, has quality good)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(great barrier reef, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(great barrier reef, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Remarkable(great barrier reef, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(reef, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.06
Typical(great barrier reef, has quality good) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Typical(reef, has quality good)