great britain: was eager

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents america
Weight: 0.71
, european union
Weight: 0.70
, north america
Weight: 0.68
, ireland
Weight: 0.66
, democracy
Weight: 0.65
Siblings britain
Weight: 0.60
, latin america
Weight: 0.38
, south america
Weight: 0.38
, central america
Weight: 0.37
, germany
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
was eager 1.00
was able 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was eager)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(britain, was able)
0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was eager)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(germany, was able)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(great britain, was eager)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(germany, was able)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(germany, was able)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(great britain, was eager)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(britain, was able)
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(britain, was able)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(great britain, was eager)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(great britain, was eager)

Similarity expansion

0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.68
Typical(great britain, was eager)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(great britain, was able)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(great britain, was eager)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(great britain, was able)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(great britain, was eager)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(great britain, was able)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(great britain, was eager)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was able)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(great britain, was eager)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(great britain, was eager)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was eager)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(great britain, was eager)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(great britain, was eager)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was eager)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(germany, was able)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.56
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(great britain, was eager)
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Typical(britain, was able)