great dane: be bigger than dogs

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents breed
Weight: 0.66
, thing
Weight: 0.60
, dog
Weight: 0.56
, puppy
Weight: 0.54
, monster
Weight: 0.53
Siblings rottweiler
Weight: 0.45
, good luck
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be bigger than dogs 1.00
be bigger than other dogs 0.99
is good dogs 0.85
is dogs 0.84
be considered dogs 0.82
be considered working dogs 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(great dane, be bigger than dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.02
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, is good dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, is dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 1.00
Plausible(dog, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(great dane, be bigger than dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(rottweiler, is dogs)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, is dogs)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.70
Remarkable(rottweiler, is good dogs)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(rottweiler, is good dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(great dane, be bigger than dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be bigger than other dogs)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(great dane, be bigger than other dogs)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(great dane, be bigger than other dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(great dane, is dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(great dane, be considered dogs)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be considered dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(great dane, be considered dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be considered working dogs)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Typical(great dane, be bigger than other dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(great dane, be considered working dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(great dane, be considered working dogs)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(great dane, is dogs)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(great dane, is dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is dogs)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(great dane, is good dogs)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(great dane, be considered dogs)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(great dane, be considered working dogs)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(great dane, is good dogs)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(great dane, is good dogs)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Remarkable(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(great dane, is good dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be bigger than dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Typical(great dane, be bigger than dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(rottweiler, is dogs)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Remarkable(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(rottweiler, is good dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.35
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.34
Typical(great dane, be bigger than dogs)
Evidence: 1.00
¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)