great dane: be considered working dogs

Related concepts

Parents	breed Weight: 0.66 , thing Weight: 0.60 , dog Weight: 0.56 , puppy Weight: 0.54 , monster Weight: 0.53
Siblings	rottweiler Weight: 0.45 , good luck Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
be considered working dogs	1.00
be considered dogs	0.92
is good dogs	0.87
is dogs	0.86
be bigger than other dogs	0.78
be bigger than dogs	0.78
is good apartment dogs	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(dog, is dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(great dane, be considered working dogs)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.06
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Plausible(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.47

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(dog, is dogs)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, is good dogs)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

¬ Remarkable(rottweiler, is dogs)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(dog, is dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

Remarkable(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Plausible(great dane, be considered working dogs)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.52

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.99

Remarkable(rottweiler, is dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Plausible(rottweiler, is dogs)

0.39

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

Remarkable(rottweiler, is good dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.87

¬ Plausible(rottweiler, is good dogs)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Salient(great dane, be considered working dogs)

Similarity expansion

0.72

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Plausible(great dane, be considered dogs)

0.71

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(great dane, be considered dogs)

0.70

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.06

Remarkable(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Remarkable(great dane, be considered dogs)

0.66

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(great dane, is dogs)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Typical(great dane, is dogs)

0.62

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.17

¬ Salient(great dane, is dogs)

0.61

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.92

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Typical(great dane, be considered dogs)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.06

Remarkable(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Remarkable(great dane, be bigger than other dogs)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(great dane, is good dogs)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.10

¬ Plausible(great dane, be bigger than other dogs)

0.60

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.11

¬ Salient(great dane, be bigger than other dogs)

0.55

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.06

Remarkable(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Remarkable(great dane, is dogs)

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.06

Remarkable(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.22

¬ Remarkable(great dane, is good apartment dogs)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Typical(great dane, be bigger than dogs)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.27

¬ Plausible(great dane, be bigger than dogs)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.37

¬ Typical(great dane, be bigger than other dogs)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Plausible(great dane, is good dogs)

0.49

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(great dane, be bigger than dogs)

0.47

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Salient(great dane, is good apartment dogs)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.48

¬ Salient(great dane, is good dogs)

0.41

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.06

Remarkable(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Remarkable(great dane, be bigger than dogs)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.41

¬ Plausible(great dane, is good apartment dogs)

0.35

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.76

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.65

¬ Typical(great dane, is good apartment dogs)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.26
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.06

Remarkable(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Remarkable(great dane, is good dogs)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Salient(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(great dane, be considered working dogs)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.06

Plausible(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.29

¬ Typical(great dane, be considered working dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.03

¬ Typical(rottweiler, is dogs)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.87

Evidence: 0.06

¬ Remarkable(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Typical(rottweiler, is good dogs)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.12

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.29

Typical(great dane, be considered working dogs) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(dog, is dogs)