great white shark: have sharp teeth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shark
Weight: 0.79
, predator
Weight: 0.72
, fish
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.65
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.42
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.41
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
have sharp teeth 1.00
has physical part teeth 0.86

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.57
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(predator, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(shark, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(great white shark, have sharp teeth)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(shark, have sharp teeth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(shark, has physical part teeth)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(predator, have sharp teeth)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(shark, have sharp teeth)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(predator, have sharp teeth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(shark, has physical part teeth)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, has physical part teeth)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.42
Plausible(predator, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Plausible(shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(shark, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(great white shark, have sharp teeth)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.49
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.17
Remarkable(whale shark, has physical part teeth)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(whale shark, has physical part teeth)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Salient(great white shark, have sharp teeth)

Similarity expansion

0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Plausible(great white shark, has physical part teeth)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(great white shark, has physical part teeth)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
Remarkable(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, has physical part teeth)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(great white shark, has physical part teeth)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Salient(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, have sharp teeth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Typical(great white shark, have sharp teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(predator, have sharp teeth)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(shark, have sharp teeth)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(shark, has physical part teeth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Typical(whale shark, has physical part teeth)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.28
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Typical(shark, has physical part teeth)
0.27
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.59
¬ Typical(predator, have sharp teeth)
0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.24
Typical(great white shark, have sharp teeth)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(shark, have sharp teeth)