great white shark: is most dangerous

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shark
Weight: 0.79
, predator
Weight: 0.72
, fish
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.65
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.42
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.41
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
is most dangerous 1.00
be dangerous to humans 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.40
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(shark, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(great white shark, is most dangerous)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(great white shark, is most dangerous)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(shark, be dangerous to humans)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is most dangerous)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(shark, be dangerous to humans)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.30
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.62
Plausible(shark, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(great white shark, is most dangerous)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Plausible(great white shark, is most dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.22
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(great white shark, is most dangerous)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(great white shark, is most dangerous)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(great white shark, is most dangerous)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(great white shark, be dangerous to humans)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(great white shark, is most dangerous)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(great white shark, be dangerous to humans)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(great white shark, is most dangerous)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(great white shark, be dangerous to humans)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
Remarkable(great white shark, is most dangerous)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, be dangerous to humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.49
Salient(great white shark, is most dangerous)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(great white shark, is most dangerous)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is most dangerous)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Plausible(great white shark, is most dangerous)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(great white shark, is most dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.31
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, is most dangerous)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(shark, be dangerous to humans)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(great white shark, is most dangerous)
Evidence: 0.77
¬ Typical(shark, be dangerous to humans)