great white shark: protect itself

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents shark
Weight: 0.79
, predator
Weight: 0.72
, fish
Weight: 0.67
, animal
Weight: 0.65
, species
Weight: 0.65
Siblings whale shark
Weight: 0.42
, hammerhead shark
Weight: 0.41
, tiger shark
Weight: 0.41

Related properties

Property Similarity
protect itself 1.00
protect themselves 0.89
protect from predators 0.77
is protected 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.42
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(species, is protected)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(great white shark, protect itself)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Plausible(species, is protected)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Remarkable(species, is protected)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(tiger shark, protect themselves)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.23
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(whale shark, is protected)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.24
Plausible(species, is protected)
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Plausible(great white shark, protect itself)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.87
Remarkable(whale shark, is protected)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Plausible(whale shark, is protected)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(tiger shark, protect themselves)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(tiger shark, protect themselves)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Salient(great white shark, protect itself)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, protect themselves)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Typical(great white shark, protect from predators)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.88
Remarkable(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, protect from predators)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Salient(great white shark, protect themselves)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(great white shark, protect themselves)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Plausible(great white shark, protect from predators)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Typical(great white shark, protect themselves)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Salient(great white shark, protect from predators)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.56
Salient(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, protect itself)

Typical implies Plausible

0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.36
Plausible(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(great white shark, protect itself)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.37
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(species, is protected)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(whale shark, is protected)
0.02
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.20
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(tiger shark, protect themselves)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.21
Typical(great white shark, protect itself)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(species, is protected)