great: looking cities

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents stuff
Weight: 0.59
, person
Weight: 0.55
, country
Weight: 0.54
, place
Weight: 0.54
Siblings ray charles
Weight: 0.65
, michael jordan
Weight: 0.64
, buddy holly
Weight: 0.64
, bob hope
Weight: 0.64
, duke ellington
Weight: 0.63

Related properties

Property Similarity
looking cities 1.00
looking working cities 0.96

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(great, looking cities)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Salient(great, looking cities)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(great, looking cities)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(great, looking working cities)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.27
Remarkable(great, looking cities)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(great, looking working cities)
0.78
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(great, looking cities)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Salient(great, looking working cities)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.96
Evidence: 0.48
Typical(great, looking cities)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Typical(great, looking working cities)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.26
Salient(great, looking cities)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(great, looking cities)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Remarkable(great, looking cities)

Typical implies Plausible

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.32
Plausible(great, looking cities)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(great, looking cities)