green bean: has quality worth

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents green
Weight: 0.75
, crop
Weight: 0.70
, vegetable
Weight: 0.69
, rice
Weight: 0.66
Siblings cucumber
Weight: 0.57
, broad bean
Weight: 0.37
, red cabbage
Weight: 0.37
, tomato sauce
Weight: 0.37

Related properties

Property Similarity
has quality worth 1.00
is quality 0.83
has quality bad 0.82

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(green bean, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Remarkable(broad bean, has quality bad)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(green bean, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.06
Remarkable(broad bean, has quality bad)
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Plausible(broad bean, has quality bad)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(green bean, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(green bean, has quality worth)

Similarity expansion

0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(green bean, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(green bean, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(green bean, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(green bean, has quality bad)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(green bean, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(green bean, has quality bad)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(green bean, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(green bean, is quality)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(green bean, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Typical(green bean, has quality bad)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.79
Remarkable(green bean, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(green bean, is quality)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(green bean, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(green bean, is quality)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.78
Typical(green bean, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(green bean, is quality)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.93
Salient(green bean, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(green bean, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(green bean, has quality worth)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(green bean, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Typical(green bean, has quality worth)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.82
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Remarkable(green bean, has quality worth)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(broad bean, has quality bad)