green: has quality evil

Related concepts

Parents	color Weight: 0.60 , yellow Weight: 0.59 , place Weight: 0.59 , guy Weight: 0.59 , topic Weight: 0.57
Siblings	cyan Weight: 0.37 , blue light Weight: 0.34 , red Weight: 0.34 , blue Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality evil	1.00
be associated with evil	0.85
has quality good	0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.52

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(guy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(green, has quality evil)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(color, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(green, has quality evil)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.01

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Plausible(color, has quality good)

0.01

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.12
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Plausible(guy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.42

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(color, has quality good)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Remarkable(guy, has quality good)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

¬ Remarkable(blue, has quality good)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 1.00

Plausible(guy, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

Remarkable(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(green, has quality evil)

0.32

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.94

Plausible(color, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

Remarkable(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Plausible(green, has quality evil)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.36

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.68

Remarkable(blue, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.80

¬ Plausible(blue, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.12

¬ Salient(green, has quality evil)

Similarity expansion

0.52

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.09

Remarkable(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.31

¬ Remarkable(green, be associated with evil)

0.48

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.38

¬ Salient(green, be associated with evil)

0.44

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.70

¬ Typical(green, be associated with evil)

0.40

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.85

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.52

¬ Plausible(green, be associated with evil)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Typical(green, has quality good)

0.19

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.09

Remarkable(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(green, has quality good)

0.18

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.82

¬ Plausible(green, has quality good)

0.11

Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.17
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.94

¬ Salient(green, has quality good)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Salient(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(green, has quality evil)

Typical implies Plausible

0.29

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.12

Plausible(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.44

¬ Typical(green, has quality evil)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(color, has quality good)

0.36

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(guy, has quality good)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.09

¬ Remarkable(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.85

¬ Typical(blue, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 0.98

¬ Typical(color, has quality good)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.78

Evidence: 0.44

Typical(green, has quality evil) ⋁

Evidence: 1.00

¬ Typical(guy, has quality good)