greenhouse effect: be harmful

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents problem
Weight: 0.64
, issue
Weight: 0.63
, effect
Weight: 0.61
, concept
Weight: 0.61
, topic
Weight: 0.61
Siblings air pollution
Weight: 0.33
, organic chemistry
Weight: 0.32
, photosynthesis
Weight: 0.32
, gardening
Weight: 0.32
, ecology
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be harmful 1.00
is beneficial 0.80

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.04
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(greenhouse effect, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Remarkable(air pollution, be harmful)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.59
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(greenhouse effect, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
Remarkable(air pollution, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Plausible(air pollution, be harmful)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(greenhouse effect, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(greenhouse effect, be harmful)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Typical(greenhouse effect, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(greenhouse effect, is beneficial)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(greenhouse effect, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(greenhouse effect, is beneficial)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(greenhouse effect, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Plausible(greenhouse effect, is beneficial)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(greenhouse effect, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(greenhouse effect, is beneficial)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(greenhouse effect, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(greenhouse effect, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(greenhouse effect, be harmful)

Typical implies Plausible

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(greenhouse effect, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(greenhouse effect, be harmful)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(greenhouse effect, be harmful) ⋁
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Typical(air pollution, be harmful)