greenhouse: be designed for use

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents building
Weight: 0.67
, plant
Weight: 0.65
, garden
Weight: 0.64
Siblings carbon
Weight: 0.63
, power plant
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be designed for use 1.00
is designed 0.95
be used 0.83

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.43
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(building, be used)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(greenhouse, be designed for use)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(greenhouse, be designed for use)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Plausible(building, be used)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(greenhouse, be designed for use)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(building, be used)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.34
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Plausible(building, be used)
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(greenhouse, be designed for use)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Plausible(greenhouse, be designed for use)

Salient implies Plausible

0.18
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(greenhouse, be designed for use)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(greenhouse, be designed for use)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(greenhouse, be designed for use)
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Remarkable(greenhouse, is designed)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(greenhouse, be designed for use)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(greenhouse, is designed)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(greenhouse, be designed for use)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Typical(greenhouse, be used)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(greenhouse, be designed for use)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(greenhouse, is designed)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
Remarkable(greenhouse, be designed for use)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(greenhouse, be used)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(greenhouse, be designed for use)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(greenhouse, is designed)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(greenhouse, be designed for use)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Salient(greenhouse, be used)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(greenhouse, be designed for use)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(greenhouse, be used)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(greenhouse, be designed for use)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(greenhouse, be designed for use)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(greenhouse, be designed for use)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Plausible(greenhouse, be designed for use)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Typical(greenhouse, be designed for use)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(greenhouse, be designed for use)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(building, be used)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Typical(greenhouse, be designed for use)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(building, be used)