greenland: be covered with snow

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents island
Weight: 0.61
, land
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.57
, region
Weight: 0.56
, area
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cayman islands
Weight: 0.35
, long island
Weight: 0.34
, rhode island
Weight: 0.34
, solomon islands
Weight: 0.34
, staten island
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
be covered with snow 1.00
be covered with ice 0.89
be covered in ice 0.89
covered in ice 0.89
be covered in ice covered in green 0.88
be covered throughout year 0.80
have ice 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.46
¬ Salient(greenland, be covered with snow)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(greenland, covered in ice)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Salient(greenland, covered in ice)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be covered in ice)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be covered with ice)
0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(greenland, be covered in ice)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be covered in ice covered in green)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(greenland, be covered with ice)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(greenland, be covered in ice covered in green)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Typical(greenland, covered in ice)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(greenland, be covered in ice)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(greenland, covered in ice)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(greenland, be covered with ice)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Plausible(greenland, be covered in ice)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(greenland, have ice)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(greenland, be covered in ice covered in green)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.71
Remarkable(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be covered throughout year)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Salient(greenland, have ice)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Plausible(greenland, be covered with ice)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Plausible(greenland, be covered in ice covered in green)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Typical(greenland, have ice)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(greenland, have ice)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.84
¬ Salient(greenland, be covered throughout year)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.35
Typical(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(greenland, be covered throughout year)
0.28
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.41
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Plausible(greenland, be covered throughout year)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.46
Salient(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Remarkable(greenland, be covered with snow)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(greenland, be covered with snow)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(greenland, be covered with snow)