greenland: have low population

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents island
Weight: 0.61
, land
Weight: 0.59
, place
Weight: 0.57
, region
Weight: 0.56
, area
Weight: 0.54
Siblings cayman islands
Weight: 0.35
, long island
Weight: 0.34
, rhode island
Weight: 0.34
, solomon islands
Weight: 0.34
, staten island
Weight: 0.34

Related properties

Property Similarity
have low population 1.00
have low population density 0.92
have small population 0.91
have population density 0.87
is low populated 0.80
have high hiv rate 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.49
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(place, have low population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(greenland, have low population)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(place, have low population density)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(place, have low population density)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.76
Plausible(place, have low population density) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Plausible(greenland, have low population)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Salient(greenland, have low population)

Similarity expansion

0.74
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Salient(greenland, have low population density)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Salient(greenland, have small population)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(greenland, have low population density)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Plausible(greenland, have low population density)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Salient(greenland, have population density)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Typical(greenland, have low population density)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Typical(greenland, have population density)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Plausible(greenland, have population density)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(greenland, have small population)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(greenland, have small population)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(greenland, have small population)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.93
¬ Salient(greenland, is low populated)
0.58
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Typical(greenland, is low populated)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.78
¬ Remarkable(greenland, have population density)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Plausible(greenland, is low populated)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.69
Remarkable(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.68
¬ Remarkable(greenland, is low populated)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Salient(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(greenland, have low population)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.80
Plausible(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Typical(greenland, have low population)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.43
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(place, have low population density)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.92
Evidence: 0.83
Typical(greenland, have low population) ⋁
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(place, have low population density)