grill: be hot

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.69
, barbecue
Weight: 0.61
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.36
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, deli
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be hot 1.00
be used to cook hot dog 0.84
be used to cook hot dog and hamburger 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.29
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.52
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(barbecue, be used to cook hot dog)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(grill, be hot)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(grill, be hot)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Plausible(barbecue, be used to cook hot dog)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(grill, be hot)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, be used to cook hot dog)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
Plausible(barbecue, be used to cook hot dog)
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(grill, be hot)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(grill, be hot)

Salient implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.50
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(grill, be hot)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Salient(grill, be hot)

Similarity expansion

0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(grill, be hot)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(grill, be used to cook hot dog and hamburger)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(grill, be hot)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(grill, be used to cook hot dog and hamburger)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(grill, be hot)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Salient(grill, be used to cook hot dog and hamburger)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.60
Remarkable(grill, be hot)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(grill, be used to cook hot dog and hamburger)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.53
Salient(grill, be hot)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(grill, be hot)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(grill, be hot)

Typical implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.32
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(grill, be hot)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Typical(grill, be hot)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(grill, be hot)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(barbecue, be used to cook hot dog)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.72
Typical(grill, be hot)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Typical(barbecue, be used to cook hot dog)