grill: has physical part lids

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents restaurant
Weight: 0.69
, barbecue
Weight: 0.61
, seafood restaurant
Weight: 0.59
, thing
Weight: 0.57
Siblings italian restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, steakhouse
Weight: 0.36
, fast food restaurant
Weight: 0.36
, french restaurant
Weight: 0.35
, deli
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part lids 1.00
has physical part vents 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(barbecue, has physical part lids)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(grill, has physical part lids)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(grill, has physical part lids)
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(barbecue, has physical part lids)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.29
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.51
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(grill, has physical part lids)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(barbecue, has physical part lids)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.27
Plausible(barbecue, has physical part lids)
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(grill, has physical part lids)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(grill, has physical part lids)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(grill, has physical part lids)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Salient(grill, has physical part lids)

Similarity expansion

0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(grill, has physical part lids)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Typical(grill, has physical part vents)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.81
Remarkable(grill, has physical part lids)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(grill, has physical part vents)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(grill, has physical part lids)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(grill, has physical part vents)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.76
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(grill, has physical part lids)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(grill, has physical part vents)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.52
Salient(grill, has physical part lids)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(grill, has physical part lids)
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(grill, has physical part lids)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.38
Plausible(grill, has physical part lids)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(grill, has physical part lids)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.42
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.81
¬ Remarkable(grill, has physical part lids)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(barbecue, has physical part lids)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.25
Typical(grill, has physical part lids)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(barbecue, has physical part lids)