grilling: has quality change

Related concepts

Parents	topic Weight: 0.52 , method Weight: 0.51 , way Weight: 0.44 , application Weight: 0.41
Siblings	cooking Weight: 0.32 , fresh food Weight: 0.30 , cold turkey Weight: 0.30 , public speaking Weight: 0.30 , waterboarding Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property	Similarity
has quality change	1.00
has quality good	0.86
has quality better	0.86
has quality bad	0.86
has quality help	0.83
be called change	0.83
be considered change	0.81
be in which changed	0.79
be changed	0.79
improve life	0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

Evidence

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.53

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(grilling, has quality change)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(way, has quality help) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(grilling, has quality change)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.05

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Plausible(way, has quality help)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.71

¬ Plausible(method, has quality bad)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(method, has quality bad)

0.21

Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.73

¬ Remarkable(way, has quality help)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Remarkable(cooking, has quality change)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.39
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

¬ Remarkable(cooking, has quality good)

0.04

Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.31
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

¬ Remarkable(fresh food, has quality better)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.35

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.71

Plausible(method, has quality bad) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(grilling, has quality change)

0.34

Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.61

Plausible(way, has quality help) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

Remarkable(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.34

¬ Plausible(grilling, has quality change)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

Remarkable(cooking, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Plausible(cooking, has quality change)

0.50

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.90

Remarkable(fresh food, has quality better) ⋁

Evidence: 0.50

¬ Plausible(fresh food, has quality better)

0.46

Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.79

Remarkable(cooking, has quality good) ⋁

Evidence: 0.78

¬ Plausible(cooking, has quality good)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20

Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.46

¬ Salient(grilling, has quality change)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.46

Salient(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(grilling, has quality change)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.34

Plausible(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.26

¬ Typical(grilling, has quality change)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(way, has quality help)

0.16

Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.38
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.36

¬ Typical(fresh food, has quality better)

0.08

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 1.00

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.54

¬ Typical(cooking, has quality change)

0.05

Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Remarkable(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.77

¬ Typical(cooking, has quality good)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.22

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.83

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.61

¬ Typical(way, has quality help)

0.17

Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.40
Similarity weight: 0.86

Evidence: 0.26

Typical(grilling, has quality change) ⋁

Evidence: 0.81

¬ Typical(method, has quality bad)