grilling: is frying

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents topic
Weight: 0.52
, method
Weight: 0.51
, way
Weight: 0.44
, application
Weight: 0.41
Siblings cooking
Weight: 0.32
, fresh food
Weight: 0.30
, cold turkey
Weight: 0.30
, public speaking
Weight: 0.30
, waterboarding
Weight: 0.30

Related properties

Property Similarity
is frying 1.00
be in microwave oven 0.79
be considered cooking 0.77
be with wok 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(grilling, is frying)
Evidence: 0.08
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be in microwave oven)
0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.15
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(grilling, is frying)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Remarkable(cooking, be with wok)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(grilling, is frying)
Evidence: 0.08
Remarkable(cooking, be in microwave oven)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Plausible(cooking, be in microwave oven)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(grilling, is frying)
Evidence: 0.94
Remarkable(cooking, be with wok)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Plausible(cooking, be with wok)

Salient implies Plausible

0.20
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.71
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(grilling, is frying)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Salient(grilling, is frying)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.34
Salient(grilling, is frying)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(grilling, is frying)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(grilling, is frying)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.13
Plausible(grilling, is frying)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(grilling, is frying)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(grilling, is frying)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Typical(cooking, be with wok)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Remarkable(grilling, is frying)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Typical(cooking, be in microwave oven)