grizzly bear: be dangerous to humans

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents black bear
Weight: 0.77
, predator
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.74
, carnivore
Weight: 0.73
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.40
, cougar
Weight: 0.40
, wolf
Weight: 0.39
, polar bear
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be dangerous to humans 1.00
be useful to humans 0.89
is dangerous 0.88
react to humans 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(black bear, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(black bear, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(black bear, is dangerous)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.07
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(cougar, is dangerous)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(black bear, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.47
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.64
Remarkable(cougar, is dangerous)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Plausible(cougar, is dangerous)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)

Similarity expansion

0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, react to humans)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, react to humans)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, be useful to humans)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, is dangerous)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(grizzly bear, react to humans)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Salient(grizzly bear, be useful to humans)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, be useful to humans)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Salient(grizzly bear, is dangerous)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, is dangerous)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, is dangerous)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, be useful to humans)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.61
Remarkable(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, react to humans)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.72
Salient(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.64
Plausible(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.19
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.42
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(black bear, is dangerous)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Typical(cougar, is dangerous)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.70
Typical(grizzly bear, be dangerous to humans)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Typical(black bear, is dangerous)