grizzly bear: be important to canada

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents black bear
Weight: 0.77
, predator
Weight: 0.75
, animal
Weight: 0.74
, carnivore
Weight: 0.73
Siblings panda bear
Weight: 0.40
, cougar
Weight: 0.40
, wolf
Weight: 0.39
, polar bear
Weight: 0.39

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important to canada 1.00
live in canada 0.94

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.26
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, be important to canada)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(polar bear, live in canada)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(grizzly bear, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(polar bear, live in canada)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Plausible(polar bear, live in canada)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(grizzly bear, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.26
Remarkable(polar bear, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(polar bear, be important to canada)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(grizzly bear, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(grizzly bear, be important to canada)

Similarity expansion

0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(grizzly bear, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Plausible(grizzly bear, live in canada)
0.80
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(grizzly bear, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Salient(grizzly bear, live in canada)
0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
Remarkable(grizzly bear, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, live in canada)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(grizzly bear, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, live in canada)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(grizzly bear, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, be important to canada)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Plausible(grizzly bear, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(grizzly bear, be important to canada)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(polar bear, be important to canada)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Remarkable(grizzly bear, be important to canada)
Evidence: 0.45
¬ Typical(polar bear, live in canada)