grocery: be at cabinet

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.67
, convenience store
Weight: 0.65
, store shelf
Weight: 0.60
, staple
Weight: 0.58
, necessity
Weight: 0.57
Siblings supermarket
Weight: 0.39
, food store
Weight: 0.38
, hardware store
Weight: 0.36
, food
Weight: 0.35

Related properties

Property Similarity
be at cabinet 1.00
be at supply cabinet 0.89

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.19
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.28
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(staple, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(grocery, be at cabinet)
0.14
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.24
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(staple, be at supply cabinet)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(grocery, be at cabinet)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(grocery, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.15
¬ Plausible(staple, be at cabinet)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(grocery, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Plausible(staple, be at supply cabinet)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.57
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(staple, be at cabinet)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Remarkable(staple, be at supply cabinet)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.15
Plausible(staple, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(grocery, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(grocery, be at cabinet)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.10
Plausible(staple, be at supply cabinet)
Evidence: 0.04
Remarkable(grocery, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Plausible(grocery, be at cabinet)

Salient implies Plausible

0.27
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(grocery, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Salient(grocery, be at cabinet)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.05
Salient(grocery, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(grocery, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be at cabinet)

Typical implies Plausible

0.14
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.16
Plausible(grocery, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Typical(grocery, be at cabinet)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.50
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(staple, be at cabinet)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(staple, be at supply cabinet)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(grocery, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(staple, be at cabinet)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.85
Typical(grocery, be at cabinet)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Typical(staple, be at supply cabinet)