grocery: be expensive in nunavut

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.67
, convenience store
Weight: 0.65
, store shelf
Weight: 0.60
, shopping center
Weight: 0.58
, staple
Weight: 0.58
Siblings supermarket
Weight: 0.39
, food store
Weight: 0.38
, hardware store
Weight: 0.36
, shopping cart
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be expensive in nunavut 1.00
be in nunavut expensive 1.00
is expensive 0.98
get expensive 0.95
be like pacsun expensive 0.94
is more expensive 0.94
be expensive in us 0.88
is cheaper 0.84
be expensive in hawaii 0.80
is overpriced 0.79

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.63
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(grocery store, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(convenience store, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(grocery store, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(convenience store, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(staple, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(grocery store, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Plausible(staple, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(convenience store, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(grocery store, is expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Plausible(convenience store, is more expensive)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(grocery store, is more expensive)
0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(grocery store, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, is expensive)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, is expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Remarkable(staple, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, is more expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Remarkable(convenience store, is more expensive)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(grocery store, is cheaper)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Remarkable(shopping cart, is expensive)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.96
Plausible(grocery store, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.92
Plausible(convenience store, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.95
Plausible(grocery store, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
0.38
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.82
Plausible(staple, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(convenience store, is more expensive)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Plausible(grocery store, is cheaper)
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Plausible(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.53
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.57
Remarkable(shopping cart, is expensive)
Evidence: 0.94
¬ Plausible(shopping cart, is expensive)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.67
¬ Salient(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)

Similarity expansion

0.79
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(grocery, be in nunavut expensive)
0.77
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Salient(grocery, be in nunavut expensive)
0.76
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(grocery, is expensive)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(grocery, be in nunavut expensive)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(grocery, get expensive)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.86
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be in nunavut expensive)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(grocery, is more expensive)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Typical(grocery, be expensive in us)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Typical(grocery, be expensive in hawaii)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(grocery, be expensive in hawaii)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(grocery, is expensive)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.34
¬ Plausible(grocery, be expensive in hawaii)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(grocery, get expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Plausible(grocery, is more expensive)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in hawaii)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Plausible(grocery, be expensive in us)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.67
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(grocery, is expensive)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Salient(grocery, get expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(grocery, is more expensive)
0.54
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.83
¬ Salient(grocery, be expensive in us)
0.49
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(grocery, is expensive)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.60
¬ Remarkable(grocery, is more expensive)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.58
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(grocery, get expensive)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.33
Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.61
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in us)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.67
Salient(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.73
Plausible(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Typical(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.36
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(staple, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(convenience store, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(grocery store, is expensive)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(convenience store, is more expensive)
0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(grocery store, is more expensive)
0.30
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(grocery store, is cheaper)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.33
¬ Remarkable(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(shopping cart, is expensive)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.44
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(staple, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Typical(convenience store, is expensive)
0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(grocery store, is expensive)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.91
¬ Typical(convenience store, is more expensive)
0.41
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.94
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(grocery store, is more expensive)
0.37
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.84
Evidence: 0.90
Typical(grocery, be expensive in nunavut)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(grocery store, is cheaper)