grocery: is stores arranged

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents grocery store
Weight: 0.67
, convenience store
Weight: 0.65
, store shelf
Weight: 0.60
, shopping center
Weight: 0.58
, staple
Weight: 0.58
Siblings supermarket
Weight: 0.39
, food store
Weight: 0.38
, hardware store
Weight: 0.36
, shopping cart
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
is stores arranged 1.00
is stores 0.89
have stores 0.89
close stores 0.86
be called box stores 0.83
have closing stores 0.83
be called big box stores 0.82
bother with 24 hour stores 0.78
arranged way 0.78
is shops 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.58
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(staple, have stores)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(grocery, is stores arranged)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(staple, close stores)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(grocery, is stores arranged)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(staple, have closing stores)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(grocery, is stores arranged)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.06
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(staple, have closing stores)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Plausible(staple, close stores)
0.05
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.44
¬ Plausible(staple, have stores)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.40
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(staple, have closing stores)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.16
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.85
¬ Remarkable(staple, close stores)
0.07
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.14
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Remarkable(staple, have stores)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.05
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.45
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.56
¬ Remarkable(supermarket, bother with 24 hour stores)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.37
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.44
Plausible(staple, have stores)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(grocery, is stores arranged)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.40
Plausible(staple, close stores)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(grocery, is stores arranged)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 1.00
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.30
Plausible(staple, have closing stores)
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Plausible(grocery, is stores arranged)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.31
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.56
Remarkable(supermarket, bother with 24 hour stores)
Evidence: 0.96
¬ Plausible(supermarket, bother with 24 hour stores)

Salient implies Plausible

0.17
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(grocery, is stores arranged)

Similarity expansion

0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(grocery, is stores)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.01
¬ Typical(grocery, is stores)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
Remarkable(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Remarkable(grocery, is shops)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.03
¬ Typical(grocery, is shops)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(grocery, is stores)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Salient(grocery, is stores)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(grocery, is shops)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.75
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(grocery, is shops)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.51
Salient(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(grocery, is stores arranged)

Typical implies Plausible

0.47
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Plausible(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.02
¬ Typical(grocery, is stores arranged)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.33
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(staple, close stores)
0.32
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(staple, have stores)
0.20
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(staple, have closing stores)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.00
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.02
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Remarkable(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(supermarket, bother with 24 hour stores)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.32
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.86
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Typical(staple, close stores)
0.31
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(staple, have stores)
0.19
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.46
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.02
Typical(grocery, is stores arranged)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Typical(staple, have closing stores)