groom: have man

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents man
Weight: 0.62
, employee
Weight: 0.57
, member
Weight: 0.57
Siblings young man
Weight: 0.35
, young woman
Weight: 0.34
, old man
Weight: 0.34
, married couple
Weight: 0.34
, nephew
Weight: 0.33

Related properties

Property Similarity
have man 1.00
have best man 0.90

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.01
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.11
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(groom, have man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Remarkable(old man, have man)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.60
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(groom, have man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.97
Remarkable(old man, have man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.27
¬ Plausible(old man, have man)

Salient implies Plausible

0.19
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(groom, have man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Salient(groom, have man)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(groom, have man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(groom, have best man)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.55
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(groom, have man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.79
¬ Salient(groom, have best man)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(groom, have man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Plausible(groom, have best man)
0.22
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.29
Similarity weight: 0.90
Evidence: 0.05
Typical(groom, have man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Typical(groom, have best man)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Salient(groom, have man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(groom, have man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(groom, have man)

Typical implies Plausible

0.46
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.21
Plausible(groom, have man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.05
¬ Typical(groom, have man)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(groom, have man) ⋁
Evidence: 0.06
¬ Typical(old man, have man)