grooming: be for underwear

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents care
Weight: 0.61
, need
Weight: 0.57
, activity
Weight: 0.56
, service
Weight: 0.56
, topic
Weight: 0.54
Siblings beauty salon
Weight: 0.32
, sexual activity
Weight: 0.32
, escort service
Weight: 0.32
, socialization
Weight: 0.32
, cleaning
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be for underwear 1.00
be for sheer underwear 0.83
shrink clothes 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(grooming, be for underwear)
Evidence: 0.92
¬ Remarkable(cleaning, shrink clothes)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.46
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.99
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(grooming, be for underwear)
Evidence: 0.92
Remarkable(cleaning, shrink clothes)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(cleaning, shrink clothes)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(grooming, be for underwear)
Evidence: 0.20
¬ Salient(grooming, be for underwear)

Similarity expansion

0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.22
Typical(grooming, be for underwear)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Typical(grooming, be for sheer underwear)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(grooming, be for underwear)
Evidence: 0.89
¬ Plausible(grooming, be for sheer underwear)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(grooming, be for underwear)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Salient(grooming, be for sheer underwear)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.48
Similarity weight: 0.83
Evidence: 0.25
Remarkable(grooming, be for underwear)
Evidence: 0.69
¬ Remarkable(grooming, be for sheer underwear)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.20
Salient(grooming, be for underwear)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(grooming, be for underwear)
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(grooming, be for underwear)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.55
Plausible(grooming, be for underwear)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Typical(grooming, be for underwear)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.25
¬ Remarkable(grooming, be for underwear)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Typical(cleaning, shrink clothes)