ground beef: has physical part quick

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.72
, dairy product
Weight: 0.70
, pork
Weight: 0.66
, beef
Weight: 0.65
Siblings meat pie
Weight: 0.38
, meat
Weight: 0.37
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, fresh food
Weight: 0.36
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
has physical part quick 1.00
has physical part fat 0.81
go fast bad 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(meat, has physical part fat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ground beef, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(meat, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(meat, has physical part fat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ground beef, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(ground beef, has physical part quick)

Similarity expansion

0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(ground beef, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, go fast bad)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(ground beef, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(ground beef, go fast bad)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ground beef, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.28
¬ Plausible(ground beef, go fast bad)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(ground beef, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(ground beef, has physical part fat)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
Remarkable(ground beef, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, has physical part fat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(ground beef, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ground beef, has physical part fat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ground beef, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(ground beef, has physical part fat)
0.42
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.65
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.29
Typical(ground beef, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ground beef, go fast bad)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(ground beef, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ground beef, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, has physical part quick)

Typical implies Plausible

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(ground beef, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(ground beef, has physical part quick)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.10
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, has physical part quick)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(meat, has physical part fat)