ground beef: have many calories

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents food
Weight: 0.72
, dairy product
Weight: 0.70
, pork
Weight: 0.66
, beef
Weight: 0.65
Siblings meat pie
Weight: 0.38
, meat
Weight: 0.37
, pet food
Weight: 0.36
, fresh food
Weight: 0.36
, lunch meat
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
have many calories 1.00
have calories 0.98
be high in calories 0.95
have sodium 0.77
has physical part fat 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.13
¬ Remarkable(lunch meat, have sodium)
0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Remarkable(meat, has physical part fat)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.45
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.13
Remarkable(lunch meat, have sodium)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Plausible(lunch meat, have sodium)
0.44
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.19
Remarkable(meat, has physical part fat)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(meat, has physical part fat)

Salient implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(ground beef, have many calories)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Typical(ground beef, have calories)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Plausible(ground beef, have calories)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.66
¬ Salient(ground beef, have calories)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.71
¬ Typical(ground beef, be high in calories)
0.64
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.70
¬ Salient(ground beef, be high in calories)
0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.78
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.64
¬ Plausible(ground beef, be high in calories)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Salient(ground beef, have sodium)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.16
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, have sodium)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(ground beef, have sodium)
0.60
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 0.95
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, be high in calories)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ground beef, have sodium)
0.57
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.37
¬ Salient(ground beef, has physical part fat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.73
Typical(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(ground beef, has physical part fat)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.42
¬ Plausible(ground beef, has physical part fat)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.76
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, have calories)
0.53
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
Remarkable(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, has physical part fat)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.70
Salient(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, have many calories)

Typical implies Plausible

0.36
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.74
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.65
Plausible(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.73
¬ Typical(ground beef, have many calories)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Typical(lunch meat, have sodium)
0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.52
¬ Remarkable(ground beef, have many calories)
Evidence: 0.32
¬ Typical(meat, has physical part fat)