ground: be weak to ice

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents platform
Weight: 0.61
, place
Weight: 0.61
, character
Weight: 0.59
, surface
Weight: 0.58
Siblings chokehold
Weight: 0.35
, artificial turf
Weight: 0.33
, floor
Weight: 0.32
, other place
Weight: 0.32
, turf
Weight: 0.32

Related properties

Property Similarity
be weak to ice 1.00
be weak to water 0.87
be weak to grass 0.80
is cold 0.75

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(ground, be weak to ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
¬ Remarkable(floor, is cold)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.35
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.77
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ground, be weak to ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.55
Remarkable(floor, is cold) ⋁
Evidence: 0.90
¬ Plausible(floor, is cold)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ground, be weak to ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.29
¬ Salient(ground, be weak to ice)

Similarity expansion

0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(ground, be weak to ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Remarkable(ground, be weak to water)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ground, be weak to ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Plausible(ground, be weak to water)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(ground, be weak to ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.17
¬ Salient(ground, be weak to water)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 0.87
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(ground, be weak to ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(ground, be weak to water)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.22
Remarkable(ground, be weak to ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.39
¬ Remarkable(ground, be weak to grass)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.69
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.65
Typical(ground, be weak to ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Typical(ground, be weak to grass)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ground, be weak to ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.75
¬ Plausible(ground, be weak to grass)
0.34
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.49
Similarity weight: 0.80
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(ground, be weak to ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(ground, be weak to grass)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.29
Salient(ground, be weak to ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ground, be weak to ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(ground, be weak to ice)

Typical implies Plausible

0.30
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.63
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.43
Plausible(ground, be weak to ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.65
¬ Typical(ground, be weak to ice)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.08
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.75
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Remarkable(ground, be weak to ice) ⋁
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Typical(floor, is cold)