groundhog: be scare of owl

from ConceptNet
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.72
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, marmot
Weight: 0.60
, wild animal
Weight: 0.55
, animal
Weight: 0.53
Siblings rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.36
, raccoon
Weight: 0.36
, squirrel
Weight: 0.36
, tree frog
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
be scare of owl 1.00
be scare of person 0.81
be at lizard cage 0.77

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.24
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wild animal, be scare of person)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(groundhog, be scare of owl)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.07
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(groundhog, be scare of owl)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(wild animal, be scare of person)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.39
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, be scare of owl)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(wild animal, be scare of person)

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.06
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, be scare of owl)
Evidence: 0.82
¬ Remarkable(lizard, be at lizard cage)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.33
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(wild animal, be scare of person)
Evidence: 0.50
Remarkable(groundhog, be scare of owl)
Evidence: 0.04
¬ Plausible(groundhog, be scare of owl)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.42
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(groundhog, be scare of owl)
Evidence: 0.82
Remarkable(lizard, be at lizard cage)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Plausible(lizard, be at lizard cage)

Salient implies Plausible

0.15
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(groundhog, be scare of owl)
Evidence: 0.48
¬ Salient(groundhog, be scare of owl)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.48
Salient(groundhog, be scare of owl)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(groundhog, be scare of owl)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, be scare of owl)

Typical implies Plausible

0.21
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.44
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.04
Plausible(groundhog, be scare of owl)
Evidence: 0.58
¬ Typical(groundhog, be scare of owl)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.24
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.57
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, be scare of owl)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(wild animal, be scare of person)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.09
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.77
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, be scare of owl)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Typical(lizard, be at lizard cage)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.25
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.64
Similarity weight: 0.81
Evidence: 0.58
Typical(groundhog, be scare of owl)
Evidence: 0.86
¬ Typical(wild animal, be scare of person)