groundhog: chew wood

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.72
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, marmot
Weight: 0.60
, species
Weight: 0.54
Siblings rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.36
, raccoon
Weight: 0.36
, squirrel
Weight: 0.36
, sasquatch
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
chew wood 1.00
eat wood 0.91
chew on trees 0.89
chew on sticks 0.85

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, eat wood)
0.10
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, eat wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.50
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(rabbit, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(rabbit, eat wood)
0.48
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(squirrel, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(squirrel, eat wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.23
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.83
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(groundhog, chew wood)

Similarity expansion

0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(groundhog, eat wood)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.91
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(groundhog, eat wood)
0.69
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(groundhog, eat wood)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, eat wood)
0.56
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, chew on sticks)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.76
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.31
¬ Salient(groundhog, chew on sticks)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.70
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.38
¬ Plausible(groundhog, chew on sticks)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(groundhog, chew on trees)
0.50
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 0.85
Evidence: 0.41
Typical(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.54
¬ Typical(groundhog, chew on sticks)
0.47
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.24
Remarkable(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, chew on trees)
0.46
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.61
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(groundhog, chew on trees)
0.45
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.60
Similarity weight: 0.89
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(groundhog, chew on trees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Salient(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, chew wood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.33
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.68
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.22
Plausible(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(groundhog, chew wood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rabbit, eat wood)
0.11
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, chew wood)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(squirrel, eat wood)