groundhog: eat wood

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.72
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, marmot
Weight: 0.60
, species
Weight: 0.54
Siblings rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.36
, raccoon
Weight: 0.36
, squirrel
Weight: 0.36
, sasquatch
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
eat wood 1.00
chew wood 0.91
chew on trees 0.78

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Remarkability exclusitivity between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.21
¬ Remarkable(rabbit, eat wood)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.13
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.63
¬ Remarkable(squirrel, eat wood)

Remarkability from sibling implausibility

0.54
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(groundhog, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.21
Remarkable(rabbit, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.14
¬ Plausible(rabbit, eat wood)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.60
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(groundhog, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.63
Remarkable(squirrel, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.43
¬ Plausible(squirrel, eat wood)

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(groundhog, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(groundhog, eat wood)

Similarity expansion

0.63
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.81
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(groundhog, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Salient(groundhog, chew wood)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(groundhog, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, chew wood)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(groundhog, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.22
¬ Plausible(groundhog, chew wood)
0.51
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.66
Similarity weight: 0.91
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(groundhog, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(groundhog, chew wood)
0.39
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.59
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Remarkable(groundhog, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, chew on trees)
0.36
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.54
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(groundhog, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.51
¬ Salient(groundhog, chew on trees)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(groundhog, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.50
¬ Plausible(groundhog, chew on trees)
0.35
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.53
Similarity weight: 0.78
Evidence: 0.18
Typical(groundhog, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.57
¬ Typical(groundhog, chew on trees)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.11
Salient(groundhog, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(groundhog, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, eat wood)

Typical implies Plausible

0.40
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.84
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(groundhog, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Typical(groundhog, eat wood)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between siblings

0.13
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.93
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.40
¬ Typical(rabbit, eat wood)
0.12
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.18
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, eat wood)
Evidence: 0.47
¬ Typical(squirrel, eat wood)