groundhog: whistle

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents creature
Weight: 0.72
, mammal
Weight: 0.61
, marmot
Weight: 0.60
, species
Weight: 0.54
Siblings rabbit
Weight: 0.37
, lizard
Weight: 0.36
, raccoon
Weight: 0.36
, squirrel
Weight: 0.36
, sasquatch
Weight: 0.36

Related properties

Property Similarity
whistle 1.00
be called whistle 0.98
be called whistle pig 0.88

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Plausibility inference from child typicality

0.54
Rule weight: 0.66
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(marmot, whistle)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(groundhog, whistle)

Plausibility inheritance from parent to child

0.08
Rule weight: 0.09
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(groundhog, whistle)
Evidence: 0.19
¬ Plausible(marmot, whistle)

Remarkability exclusitivity betweem a parent and a child

0.56
Rule weight: 0.58
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, whistle)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Remarkable(marmot, whistle)

Remarkability from parent implausibility

0.40
Rule weight: 0.42
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.19
Plausible(marmot, whistle)
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(groundhog, whistle)
Evidence: 0.07
¬ Plausible(groundhog, whistle)

Salient implies Plausible

0.26
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.92
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(groundhog, whistle)
Evidence: 0.09
¬ Salient(groundhog, whistle)

Similarity expansion

0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(groundhog, whistle)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, be called whistle pig)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(groundhog, whistle)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Plausible(groundhog, be called whistle pig)
0.68
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.90
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(groundhog, whistle)
Evidence: 0.11
¬ Salient(groundhog, be called whistle pig)
0.67
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.80
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.12
Remarkable(groundhog, whistle)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, be called whistle)
0.66
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(groundhog, whistle)
Evidence: 0.24
¬ Salient(groundhog, be called whistle)
0.61
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.72
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(groundhog, whistle)
Evidence: 0.30
¬ Plausible(groundhog, be called whistle)
0.55
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(groundhog, whistle)
Evidence: 0.36
¬ Typical(groundhog, be called whistle pig)
0.52
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.62
Similarity weight: 0.98
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(groundhog, whistle)
Evidence: 0.49
¬ Typical(groundhog, be called whistle)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.09
Salient(groundhog, whistle)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(groundhog, whistle)
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, whistle)

Typical implies Plausible

0.38
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.79
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.07
Plausible(groundhog, whistle)
Evidence: 0.23
¬ Typical(groundhog, whistle)

Typicality and Rermarkability incompatibility between a parent and a child

0.49
Rule weight: 0.51
Evidence weight: 0.96
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.12
¬ Remarkable(groundhog, whistle)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(marmot, whistle)

Typicality inheritance from parent to child

0.35
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.73
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.23
Typical(groundhog, whistle)
Evidence: 0.35
¬ Typical(marmot, whistle)