group: be important in organization

from Quasimodo
0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Related concepts

Parents terrorist organization
Weight: 0.75
, organization
Weight: 0.64
, third party
Weight: 0.61
, way
Weight: 0.61
Siblings functional group
Weight: 0.77
, committee
Weight: 0.69
, caravan
Weight: 0.67
, choir
Weight: 0.67
, led zeppelin
Weight: 0.67

Related properties

Property Similarity
be important in organization 1.00
be important for organization 0.99
be formed in organization 0.88
be important 18 0.79
be vital to society 0.76

Priors about this statement

Cues

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Joint Necessity Sufficiency Implication Entailment Contradiction Entropy

Evidence

0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 Plausible Typical Remarkable Salient

Clauses

Salient implies Plausible

0.25
Rule weight: 0.28
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(group, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.97
¬ Salient(group, be important in organization)

Similarity expansion

0.82
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(group, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(group, be important for organization)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(group, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(group, be important for organization)
0.75
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(group, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.98
¬ Typical(group, be important for organization)
0.73
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(group, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Salient(group, be formed in organization)
0.72
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.85
Similarity weight: 0.99
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(group, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.72
¬ Remarkable(group, be important for organization)
0.71
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.95
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(group, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.41
¬ Typical(group, be formed in organization)
0.70
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.94
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(group, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.53
¬ Plausible(group, be formed in organization)
0.65
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.97
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(group, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Salient(group, be important 18)
0.62
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.82
Similarity weight: 0.88
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(group, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.87
¬ Remarkable(group, be formed in organization)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(group, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.95
¬ Plausible(group, be important 18)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.88
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.88
Typical(group, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.99
¬ Typical(group, be important 18)
0.59
Rule weight: 0.85
Evidence weight: 0.87
Similarity weight: 0.79
Evidence: 0.80
Remarkable(group, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.62
¬ Remarkable(group, be important 18)

Typical and Remarkable implies Salient

0.14
Rule weight: 0.14
Evidence weight: 0.98
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.97
Salient(group, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(group, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.80
¬ Remarkable(group, be important in organization)

Typical implies Plausible

0.43
Rule weight: 0.48
Evidence weight: 0.89
Similarity weight: 1.00
Evidence: 0.88
Plausible(group, be important in organization)
Evidence: 0.88
¬ Typical(group, be important in organization)